MarketsSports
Villa Maria: Santiago De la Fuente vs Ryo Tabata
Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result
Polymarket prices · as of Polymarket 24h vol $384.5
Villa Maria: Santiago De la Fuente vs Ryo Tabata 52%
Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.
1 level open
OptionChance: Polymarket's displayed chance: the midpoint of the best bid and ask. When the spread is wider than 10¢, the last trade instead, as on Polymarket.24hAI analystsTiers 1–2Buy
Villa Maria: Santiago De la Fuente vs Ryo Tabata52%——0 · 1
1 option trading.
AI analysts
The AI analysts are reviewing this market. Usually within the hour.
Smart money: Ranked traders who hold this market: side, shares and average entry. From Polymarket's public data.
OptionYes holdersNo holdersYes · No
Best-ranked first. Tier 1 ranks 1–10, Tier 2 ranks 11–50.
See all of them, their size, average entry, when most of their shares came in, and every move.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Rules
Show rulesHide rules
- Resolution criteria
- This market refers to the tennis match between Santiago De la Fuente and Ryo Tabata in the Villa Maria, Argentina, Qualifying, originally scheduled for November 2, 2026 at 8:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Santiago De la Fuente' if Santiago De la Fuente advances against Ryo Tabata. This market will resolve to 'Ryo Tabata' if Ryo Tabata advances against Santiago De la Fuente. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.