Skip to content

US$5,000 forecasting contest · Free · No purchase necessary · US & Canada 18+ · Opens at 1,000 entrantsOpens at 1,000 entrants

RulesJoin the contest
MarketsSports

Montevideo: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Nicolas Jarry

Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result

Polymarket prices · as of Polymarket 24h vol $0

Polymarket chance · the 1 levels nearest 50%

Montevideo: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Nicolas Jarry 50%

Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.

1 level open

OptionBuy
Montevideo: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida vs Nicolas JarryNo smart money50%

1 option trading.

AI analysts

The AI analysts are reviewing this market. Usually within the hour.

Polymarket's traders in this topic by 3-month profit
OptionYes holdersNo holdersYes · No

1 option: no ranked trader holds it

Best-ranked first. Tier 1 ranks 1–10, Tier 2 ranks 11–50.

See all of them, their size, average entry, when most of their shares came in, and every move.

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Rules

Show rulesHide rules
Resolution criteria
This market refers to the tennis match between Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida and Nicolas Jarry in the Montevideo, originally scheduled for November 17, 2026 at 8:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida' if Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida advances against Nicolas Jarry. This market will resolve to 'Nicolas Jarry' if Nicolas Jarry advances against Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by December 1, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.