MarketsSports
Brisbane 3 (Doubles): Falck/Suarez vs Ayeni/Isomura
Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result
Polymarket prices · as of Polymarket 24h vol $0
Brisbane 3 (Doubles): Falck/Suarez vs Ayeni/Isomura 50%
Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.
1 level open
OptionChance: Polymarket's displayed chance: the midpoint of the best bid and ask. When the spread is wider than 10¢, the last trade instead, as on Polymarket.Buy
Brisbane 3 (Doubles): Falck/Suarez vs Ayeni/IsomuraNo smart money50%
1 option trading.
AI analysts
The AI analysts are reviewing this market. Usually within the hour.
Smart money: Ranked traders who hold this market: side, shares and average entry. From Polymarket's public data.
OptionYes holdersNo holdersYes · No
1 option: no ranked trader holds it
Best-ranked first. Tier 1 ranks 1–10, Tier 2 ranks 11–50.
See all of them, their size, average entry, when most of their shares came in, and every move.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Rules
Show rulesHide rules
- Resolution criteria
- This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Falck/Suarez and Ayeni/Isomura in the Brisbane 3, originally scheduled for November 13, 2026 at 12:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Falck/Suarez' if the team of Falck/Suarez advances against Ayeni/Isomura. This market will resolve to 'Ayeni/Isomura' if the team of Ayeni/Isomura advances against Falck/Suarez. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 27, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.