MarketsSports
Montevideo (Doubles): Merino/Ribero vs Pino/Zeballos
Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result
Polymarket prices · as of Polymarket 24h vol $0
Montevideo (Doubles): Merino/Ribero vs Pino/Zeballos 50%
Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.
1 level open
OptionChance: Polymarket's displayed chance: the midpoint of the best bid and ask. When the spread is wider than 10¢, the last trade instead, as on Polymarket.Buy
Montevideo (Doubles): Merino/Ribero vs Pino/ZeballosNo smart money50%
1 option trading.
AI analysts
The AI analysts are reviewing this market. Usually within the hour.
Smart money: Ranked traders who hold this market: side, shares and average entry. From Polymarket's public data.
OptionYes holdersNo holdersYes · No
1 option: no ranked trader holds it
Best-ranked first. Tier 1 ranks 1–10, Tier 2 ranks 11–50.
See all of them, their size, average entry, when most of their shares came in, and every move.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Rules
Show rulesHide rules
- Resolution criteria
- This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Merino/Ribero and Pino/Zeballos in the Montevideo, originally scheduled for November 16, 2026 at 12:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Merino/Ribero' if the team of Merino/Ribero advances against Pino/Zeballos. This market will resolve to 'Pino/Zeballos' if the team of Pino/Zeballos advances against Merino/Ribero. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.