How do I trade on "Will Donald Trump publicly insult Hillary Clinton by October 31, 2026?"?

Trade this market based on your view. If you think the outcome will happen, buy the side that pays out if it happens. If you think it won't, buy the side that pays out if it doesn't. Prices reflect the market's estimated probability.

When does this market resolve?

Markets resolve automatically based on real-world data. Check the resolution date shown on the market page.

Who will Trump publicly insult by October 31?

Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result

OPEN10 levels open1 closedCloses Nov 1, 2026Research 27m ago

Polymarket price · the 4 levels nearest 50%

Hakeem Jeffries 69%Hillary Clinton 44%Candace Owens 22%Stephen Colbert 20%

Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.

10 levels open · by chance

OptionChance24hAI analystsTiers 1–2Buy

Hakeem Jeffries69%+4.0 pts60%—

Hillary Clinton44%−5.0 pts48%—

Candace Owens22%+6.0 pts12%—

Stephen Colbert20%—18%—

Ken Paxton19%−6.0 pts7%—

Zohran Mamdani11%−1.0 pts20%—

Mike Rogers9%—5%—

Friedrich Merz8%−5.0 pts10%—

Dario Amodei8%−3.5 pts7%—

Benjamin Netanyahu6%−26.5 pts18%—

1 closed level

Kaitlan Collins>99%+16.9 pts80%—

10 options trading, by chance. +13 more on Polymarket For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

AI analysts

7 AI analysts · each gives every option a chance · updated 27m ago

OptionMarketAI averageAIGap

Hakeem Jeffries69%60%−9

Hillary Clinton44%48%+4

Candace Owens22%12%−10

Stephen Colbert20%18%−2

Ken Paxton19%7%−12

Zohran Mamdani11%20%+9

+4 more options

AI analysts' average · Hillary Clinton

48%

4 pts above the market · 1 AI analyst

Biggest gap

Ken Paxton: AI 7% vs market 19%, 12 pts below

Each AI analyst's odds and reason for every option are in Plus. The Free preview shows the averages and the gaps.

For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

Rules Polymarket's rules · the same for all 11 options

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Kellian is not affiliated with Polymarket.Show rulesHide rules

Resolution criteria: This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Kellian is not affiliated with Polymarket.

How markets resolve

Kellian is not affiliated with Polymarket. For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

Who will Trump publicly insult by October 31?

Polymarket prediction market· Same prices, rules and result

OPEN10 levels open1 closedCloses Nov 1, 2026Research 27m ago

Polymarket price · the 4 levels nearest 50%

Hakeem Jeffries 69%Hillary Clinton 44%Candace Owens 22%Stephen Colbert 20%

Each level is its own Yes or No; they don't add to 100%.

10 levels open · by chance

OptionChance24hAI analystsTiers 1–2Buy

Hakeem Jeffries69%+4.0 pts60%—

Hillary Clinton44%−5.0 pts48%—

Candace Owens22%+6.0 pts12%—

Stephen Colbert20%—18%—

Ken Paxton19%−6.0 pts7%—

Zohran Mamdani11%−1.0 pts20%—

Mike Rogers9%—5%—

Friedrich Merz8%−5.0 pts10%—

Dario Amodei8%−3.5 pts7%—

Benjamin Netanyahu6%−26.5 pts18%—

1 closed level

Kaitlan Collins>99%+16.9 pts80%—

10 options trading, by chance. +13 more on Polymarket For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

AI analysts

7 AI analysts · each gives every option a chance · updated 27m ago

OptionMarketAI averageAIGap

Hakeem Jeffries69%60%−9

Hillary Clinton44%48%+4

Candace Owens22%12%−10

Stephen Colbert20%18%−2

Ken Paxton19%7%−12

Zohran Mamdani11%20%+9

+4 more options

AI analysts' average · Hillary Clinton

48%

4 pts above the market · 1 AI analyst

Biggest gap

Ken Paxton: AI 7% vs market 19%, 12 pts below

Each AI analyst's odds and reason for every option are in Plus. The Free preview shows the averages and the gaps.

For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

Rules Polymarket's rules · the same for all 11 options

Resolution criteria: This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Kellian is not affiliated with Polymarket.

How markets resolve

Kellian is not affiliated with Polymarket. For information purposes only. Not investment advice.

Who will Trump publicly insult by October 31?

1AI analysts

Rules Polymarket's rules · the same for all 11 options

Related Markets

Who will Trump publicly insult by October 31?

1AI analysts

Rules Polymarket's rules · the same for all 11 options

Related Markets

AI analysts

AI analysts